Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 21st 2015, 3:25 pm
Wiki leaks has John Brennan's AOL emails and Jeh Johnson's. I can't wait till they release Hillary's.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 21st 2015, 11:26 pm
I'm truly surprised we haven't had any of Hillary's emails leaked already. After it came out she had a server in her basement I knew they would be out soon but so far nothing.
TheQuig
Posts : 2592 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 71 Location : The Jersey Shore
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 22nd 2015, 11:38 am
Maybe after today's testimony we will start seeing some.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 22nd 2015, 4:10 pm
Nothing so far that I have heard about. I'm watching a few minutes right now and what I just saw was a Republican woman light into Hillary and then next guy, a Democrat, do everything but walk around to Hillarys chair and kiss her ass and stick his nose firmly between her cheeks. All he did was cry about having to do his job and the reason nothing new has been learned is because every Democrat currently in office is doing everything they can to make Hillary look as clean as possible.
TheQuig
Posts : 2592 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 71 Location : The Jersey Shore
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 22nd 2015, 5:51 pm
Even though she will probably walk away clean from this people will have second thoughts about her. But the election being a year away, it may be gone from peoples minds by then. She sees this inquiry as something that will boost her standings.
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 22nd 2015, 6:18 pm
Hillary could abort and eat a live fetus on TV and her polling numbers would increase among the Democrats.
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 23rd 2015, 4:58 pm
In case any of you was still thinking somehow, someway, old Hildabeast would be held accountable...
Posts : 1491 Join date : 2013-02-28 Location : About Mid AZ
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 23rd 2015, 5:21 pm
It's definitely a different era these days. Corrupt politicians, bankers, lobbyists, and financiers rob you blind and walk away with dignity while the Supreme Courts decides companies enjoy the same rights as people.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? October 23rd 2015, 6:44 pm
Kleptocracy, alternatively cleptocracy or kleptarchy, (from Greek: κλέπτης - kleptēs, "thief"[1] and κράτος - kratos, "power, rule",[2] hence "rule by thieves") is a term applied to a government seen as having a particularly severe and systemic problem with officials or a ruling class (collectively, kleptocrats) taking advantage of corruption to extend their personal wealth and political power. Typically this system involves the embezzlement of state funds at the expense of the wider population, sometimes without even the pretense of honest service.
Kleptocracies are generally associated with dictatorships, oligarchies, military juntas, or other forms of autocratic and nepotist governments in which external oversight is impossible or does not exist. This lack of oversight can be caused or exacerbated by the ability of the kleptocratic officials to control both the supply of public funds and the means disbursal for those funds. Kleptocratic rulers often treat their country's treasury as a source of personal wealth, spending funds on luxury goods and extravagances as they see fit. Many kleptocratic rulers secretly transfer public funds into hidden personal numbered bank accounts [Clinton Foundation / Clinton Global Initative] in foreign countries to provide for themselves if removed from power.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 10th 2015, 3:44 pm
The Clinton's War on Women - Roger Stone
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 29th 2015, 11:11 pm
To hear Hillary Clinton tell it, she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, the conqueror of Mount Everest — even though she was already 6 years old when he made his famous ascent.
On a visit to war-torn Bosnia in 1996, she claimed she and her entourage landed under sniper fire and had to run “with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base” — although videos of her arrival show her waltzing serenely across the tarmac, waving to the crowd.
She blamed the 2012 attack on American diplomatic and intelligence-gathering installations in Benghazi on “a disgusting video” when she knew almost from the first moment that it was a jihadist assault that took the lives of four Americans, including the ambassador to Libya.
No wonder the late William Safire, writing in The New York Times in 1996, at the height of the Whitewater investigation, called her a “congenital liar.” Said Safire: “She is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.”
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 30th 2015, 10:45 am
The people who are going to vote for her doesn't care what she has or will lie about.
There is simply no way you can make sense of that in your head, it is what it is.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 30th 2015, 12:08 pm
They will vote for her for what they factlessly(I just created that word) believe she represents which is in fact the opposite of her actions.
Scout
Posts : 371 Join date : 2013-03-01
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 30th 2015, 1:42 pm
Sadly I have heard people say they will vote for her simply because she is not republican. But at the same time admit they have no idea what she is about, or what she has done. The same people when I ask them say they don't know what her opponents are about and don't care simply because they are republican. I've also talked to people that will never vote democrat simply because its democrat. Not informed at all and on a high horse for one party while not understanding any party.
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? November 30th 2015, 3:40 pm
Politicians depend on idiots, thats why they have so much invested in keeping everyone stupid and dependent solely on them.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 1st 2015, 11:24 pm
Scout wrote:
Sadly I have heard people say they will vote for her simply because she is not republican. But at the same time admit they have no idea what she is about, or what she has done. The same people when I ask them say they don't know what her opponents are about and don't care simply because they are republican. I've also talked to people that will never vote democrat simply because its democrat. Not informed at all and on a high horse for one party while not understanding any party.
And the reason they support one party would actually sound more like support for the other party. But then again the current Republican party is liberal and the Democratic party is socialist. The only conservative or libertarian or just plain fiscally responsible are a few dozen.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 7th 2015, 5:44 pm
Just... well... wow..... One could type, rant and rave for hours on this alone.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 7th 2015, 5:57 pm
Mini documentary on the Clinton's in Larry Nichol's own words. This gives evil new definition.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 17th 2015, 12:54 pm
Liar liar liar.
Seems anytime she opens her mouth its a slim chance of being anything remotely related to the truth.
If she's elected, the democrats deserve every lasting thing she brings. They somehow believe she's working for them. HAHAHA
TheQuig
Posts : 2592 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 71 Location : The Jersey Shore
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 17th 2015, 3:05 pm
It makes me sick to my stomach, but I think she will win as the Republicans cannot get it together.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 17th 2015, 4:23 pm
TheQuig wrote:
It makes me sick to my stomach, but I think she will win as the Republicans cannot get it together.
Its still early in the process. If they do as they have done recently, they'll get it together and hit a nice stride and then screw it up at the last minute.
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 17th 2015, 5:41 pm
I tried to watch some of the debate the other nite...its far worse than I thought. They were all pandering to Gump Level IQ's.
theshyguy
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2013-04-24 Age : 40 Location : Lubbock Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 18th 2015, 12:04 am
I skipped it bc I knew it would be the usual; Trump saying how great he is and repeating himself along with a personal attack thrown in, Carson talking slow with no real substance because of a lack of knowledge, Cruz talking like a preacher and looking like a used car salesman with some grand (and somewhat sound) remarks, Rubio saying we need more security and fewer freedoms, Paul saying we need less security and more freedoms, Kasich throwing a fit bc he doesnt get enough time...etc and every other question revolving around Trump.
pup
Posts : 2121 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 55 Location : Allen TX
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? December 18th 2015, 9:41 am
There was no lie to grand nor stance to hypocritical. 10 Hillary clones were on stage dutifully reacting like the puppets they are.
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? January 7th 2016, 1:19 pm
You'll likely have to possess a FB account to view.
Really showcases the length of which she will go to lie and cover-up something relatively small, a sexual relationship. One can only imagine if it were something of real impact.
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Clinton for the Win? January 11th 2016, 4:39 pm
Emailgate adds another element of classified information, that the self anointed queen couldn't care less how unsecured it's handled. The queen's close confidant Sid Blumenthal seem to exchange classified material like exchanging cards in the card game Go Fish. Mind you that Sid isn't a US Government employee with any clearances.