Posts : 84 Join date : 2013-03-02 Age : 55 Location : Colorado
Subject: Global Warming Debunked December 28th 2013, 3:29 pm
I think most of us already call BS on Global Warming, but good information none the less. Linky
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Global Warming Debunked December 29th 2013, 1:03 pm
Well they change the nomenclature, now it's "climate change". Now anything and everything weather related is tied to "climate change" in their minds. Snows a lot? Climate change. Doesn't rain much? Climate change. Big tornado? Climate change. The solution? Pay more taxes and allow someone of authority dictate how and what you can buy. Follow the money.
Earth's first substantial atmosphere was 99% CO2. Oxygen and hydrogen weren't present. Now they're the most abundant molecules on earth.
Diesel Dan
Posts : 1709 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 52 Location : Columbia TN
Subject: Re: Global Warming Debunked December 29th 2013, 7:18 pm
The environmentalists have hit a home run with the current nomenclature. The climate will always change, so they are right.
How much of an influence we have is the question. Make no mistake about it, we can influence it.
ggbaird
Posts : 1925 Join date : 2013-02-27
Subject: Re: Global Warming Debunked January 5th 2014, 8:43 am
This guys argument...
joemac
Posts : 1916 Join date : 2013-04-17 Location : Texas
Subject: Re: Global Warming Debunked January 5th 2014, 3:08 pm
The issue with the guys theory is that doing something has the potential to have unintended or possibly hidden intended consequences.
With the amount of secrecy and money in and around this bunch, "trust" isn't a word I would associate with any of them. Toss in those that have infiltrated this organizations with agenda that can be exacerbated using these supposed programs. No thanks.
Toxicology and the effects it is and can have against the human race, our soils and environment are largely unknown or not disclosed. There's long understood fundamental science that has these chemicals and elements of aluminium, barium, strontium, are toxic and have negative effects when introduced to environments of which they are not natural.
One possible agenda that has been spoken, being able to weaponize weather with the steering or intensifying of weather, storms, droughts, etc.
The one thing they can't hide is scientific analysis. When these chemical start showing up in water supplies, soils, and start changing pH where parts of natural forests start dying off. They can no longer deny they aren't doing it. Then the question becomes who's been doing it, what have they been doing, and who approved it, and who pays for it, what effects this is going to have on our environment and humanity.