| 6.5L Turbo Diesel | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Diesel Dan
Posts : 1727 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 53 Location : Columbia TN
| Subject: 6.5L Turbo Diesel February 28th 2013, 1:01 pm | |
| Hello, My name is Dan and I own a 6.5L Turbo Diesel. They say admitting you have a problem is the first step, now I just have to figure out what is the next one BTW, First post in the GM truck forum | |
|
| |
ggbaird
Posts : 1925 Join date : 2013-02-27
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel February 28th 2013, 2:40 pm | |
| Ya, addiction sucks! Hang in there, LOL | |
|
| |
Bambam Admin
Posts : 270 Join date : 2013-02-27 Age : 57 Location : SW CT
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel February 28th 2013, 2:48 pm | |
| Is it a labor of love,or can you get the quirks fixed and have a relatively reliable truck? | |
|
| |
Ulmus Admin
Posts : 130 Join date : 2013-02-27 Age : 55 Location : Florida
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel February 28th 2013, 10:41 pm | |
| Hi Dan. Is your the original formula deisel or the ultra emmission version? (Just curious to see if you can run it with Veggie oil.) | |
|
| |
Diesel Dan
Posts : 1727 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 53 Location : Columbia TN
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 1st 2013, 3:29 pm | |
| - Bambam wrote:
- Is it a labor of love,or can you get the quirks fixed and have a relatively reliable truck?
It has been pretty reliable just not as powerful as a CTD, PSD or Dmax. Don't drive it much or haul as much so why upgrade? Wouldn't mind doing a CTD swap someday but I need to get a big shed up first. - Ulmus wrote:
- Hi Dan.
Is your the original formula deisel or the ultra emmission version? (Just curious to see if you can run it with Veggie oil.) It should be veggie approved since it uses a low pressure(1500psi) rotary injection pump. | |
|
| |
erude
Posts : 265 Join date : 2013-03-01
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 1st 2013, 10:05 pm | |
| Isn't that actually a Detroit? | |
|
| |
Diesel Dan
Posts : 1727 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 53 Location : Columbia TN
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 2nd 2013, 1:19 am | |
| Not sure Detroit Diesel likes owning up to being involved in the design of that motor. I think GM corporate engineers sprinkled their magic pixie dust on the prints. | |
|
| |
erude
Posts : 265 Join date : 2013-03-01
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 2nd 2013, 2:19 am | |
| I believe it was a Detroit as was the 6.2L | |
|
| |
Dan the man
Posts : 43 Join date : 2013-03-01 Age : 45 Location : Pa
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 2nd 2013, 9:58 pm | |
| if it's paid for and not causing you to many problems keep it beats having payments, unless you need it for work | |
|
| |
turbobill
Posts : 39 Join date : 2013-03-03 Location : Northern NY mostly, unless flying.
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 3rd 2013, 9:54 am | |
| - Diesel Dan wrote:
- Not sure Detroit Diesel likes owning up to being involved in the design of that motor. I think GM corporate engineers sprinkled their magic pixie dust on the prints.
It was never designed to be anything more than a light duty naturally aspirated engine in the 150HP range. If used as originally intended, it's a reliable engine. Turbocharging overstressed parts of it and the '94 and up electronic pump had some reliability issues. The 2001 and up AM General version is quite an improvement. | |
|
| |
Diesel Dan
Posts : 1727 Join date : 2013-02-28 Age : 53 Location : Columbia TN
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel March 3rd 2013, 10:24 am | |
| Even the non-turbo 6.2s were know for broken cranks, cracked blocks and failed head gaskets by the GM techs. Navistar addressed the block issues when they took over casting duties and I now have an enhanced Navistar engine in my truck. Another down side is that it was designed with only 2 compression rings on a 21.5:1 engine so they experience quite a bit of blow by and the oil turns black very fast. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: 6.5L Turbo Diesel | |
| |
|
| |
| 6.5L Turbo Diesel | |
|