The government and media loyalists responded to this in typical fashion by going after a persons character and to insert false narratives, motivations, negative key words like traitor. If a person wanted to sell secrets to governments and barter for the value of those secrets, the last thing a person would do would be to hand over all of the documentation to journalists to publish to the world. Makes the black market of those secrets worthless. He certainly could have done so, and become very rich.
All the negative connotations about him and the planting of false motivations comes from the governments line of thinking that its impossible for people do be motivated for principled reasons and being steadfast in those principals.
There's a bunch of good speeches and presentations and testimony on youtube from Glenn Greenwald, Jacob Appelbaum, Jeremy Scahill and others that bring a considerable amount of detail to bear on what was published. How the NSA was and is doing what they're doing, how they are able to do it, and how they've exploited just about anything that's electronic and has power. Everything.
Then you have the brazenness of General Alexander and Hayden. Just meta data this and that. We're not listening. blah bla hblah. This plays to people's ignorance of the meta data objects that are collected, and the story they tell about a persons life, everything. How many kids you have, your acquaintances, your health considerations, your activities, your eating habits, social economic status, your everything via meta analytics can tell a persons story, and predict behavior without content. Hayden has even admitted, "We kill people on meta data alone." Thanks that's real nice to know General.
If you liked that, you might also like one called, "Dirty Wars". Its about the covert operations of JSOC, special operations being outside of the normal military activity and rules of engagement. Brings some humanity to the mess.