- Charlie in TX wrote:
- I am not a midsize buyer so I haven't looked too close, It looks to me like the Colorado/Canyon is priced too close to the Toyota Tacoma.
Since the GM twins and Tacoma are competing for the same customer. That's obviously logical.
- Quote :
- If for just a few $100 more I can get a taco and sell it for near twice as much 5 years later, it is a no brainer.
We'd like to see examples of this. A $30k transaction price of a Tacoma and Colorado. In five years the Tacoma is worth $15k and the Colorado $7.5k. What information substantiates this? Or is it simply alleged?
- Quote :
- Now obviously we don't know the resale of the C/C but all American manufactures have history of high depreciation. The taco has history of the opposite.
A moment ago the GM's have a history of half, now it's unknown. Which is it?
One thing is for certain the Tacoma has never had a competitor like the current GM's. Previously the Tacoma had the market largely to its own. Now its a different story.
- Quote :
- I can see with fuel prices so low right now, GM sales will fall short. They will put $10k on the hood to move them. That will start the 'great depreciation'.
$10k off on a $35k truck, no. Clairvoyant are we?
The whole "resale" value is a gimmick most have bought into. Resale is based on the starting price being MSRP. What should be the actual metric is "net" or "transaction" price, what consumers actually paid for the product originally and what they got for it at trade in. That represents the actual cash outlay, not some fictitious figure marketed to the uninformed. Who pays MSRP? Nobody.
The reality is that vehicles can have a higher resale, but the owners paid more than owners with lower resale.
People are being sold on "resale", is equivalent to people being sold on "payments", forgoing the actual total paid price.